Research Studies

Satellite Analysis of the 05-06 June 1998
Severe Weather Event (continued)

GOES-8 sounder derived Lifted Index (LI) product

Figure 4. GOES-8 sounder Total Precipitable Water

GOES-8 sounder derived Total Precipitable Water (TPW) product

The GOES-8 sounder derived Lifted Index (LI) and Total Precipitable Water (TPW) products are shown in Figures 4 and 5. These products indicated that the atmosphere over East Texas and Louisiana was very unstable and ripe for thunderstorm development. LI values were around -8 to -12 degrees Celsius with TPW values between 50 and 55 millimeters (correlates to 2 inches). The strong cold front that collided with this moist and unstable air mass provided the lift needed to initiate a multicell convective system which went on to produce large hail and damaging winds.

Figure 6. 250 mb ETA model isotachs superimposed on GOES-8 6.7 micron water vapor

Figure 7. 500 mb heights and absolute vorticity advection superimposed on GOES-8 6.7 micron water vapor

In addition to the low-level instability, favorable upper-level dynamics contributed to these thunderstorms reaching severe levels and for sustaining the complex for several hours. The ETA model 12-hour forecast, valid at 00:00 UTC, 500 mb absolute vorticity advection and 250 mb winds in isotachs superimposed on the GOES-8 6.7 micron water vapor imagery (Figures 6 and 7) indicated that there was moderate upper level dynamics. Notice the darkening on the water vapor imagery from Central Texas into Southeast Oklahoma. This was a good indicator of the presence of an upper level jet and its subsidence region of the left rear quadrant. The ETA model indicated the forecast area was under the favorable right rear quadrant of the 250 mb jet maximum. Notice in Figure 6 how the right rear quadrant coincides with the thunderstorm cloud tops; indicating this is a region of upward vertical motion. In addition, positive vorticity advection at 500 mb (Figure 7) indicated the presence of mid level lift. The water vapor imagery helped to validate the accuracy of the ETA model, which in this situation was very good.

Conclusion: Through satellite analysis of this event, one could see a correlation between the overshooting tops and severe thunderstorms. While real-time satellite imagery is not yet available to the operational meteorologist, satellite analysis is crucial in assessing the pre-storm environment, validating the accuracy of the forecast models, and monitoring trends in upstream thunderstorm activity. Satellite imagery is best used when integrated into the forecast and warning processes.

A special thanks to the Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) at the University of Wisconsin for providing GOES-8 Sounder Derived products.

Address any questions or comments to David Wally - NWS Lake Charles Satellite Focal Point*

* Author's Current Affiliation: NWS's National Centers for Environmental Prediction - Hydrometeorological Prediction Center, Camp Springs MD

Research Studies

Satellite Analysis of the 05-06 June 1998 Severe Weather Event (continued)

Satellite Analysis of the 05-06 June 1998
Severe Weather Event (continued)